Home » 1000+ Literary Theory MCQs – Part 1: Russian Formalism

1000+ Literary Theory MCQs – Part 1: Russian Formalism

NEW: Literary Theory & Criticism course with complete video lectures and printed solved booklets delivered home. See what is inside
← All 25 PartsPart 1 of 25 · Russian Formalism
Russian Formalism

Literary Theory · Part 1 of 25 · 1910s–1930s

Russian Formalism

DefamiliarisationLiterarinessFabula & SyuzhetOPOJAZ

What is Russian Formalism? Russian Formalism was a school of literary theory, active in Moscow and Petrograd from about 1915 to 1930, that studied literature as a system of devices rather than as a reflection of life or the author. Its key ideas are literariness, defamiliarisation (ostranenie) and the difference between fabula (story) and syuzhet (plot).

This part covers Viktor Shklovsky, defamiliarisation, the core Formalist concepts, Roman Jakobson and the Prague School. The questions are drawn from previous UGC NET, SET, PhD entrance and Assistant Professor papers, and every answer comes with a short explanation. Tap an option to check your answer.

Viktor Shklovsky & Defamiliarisation

1. ‘Art as Technique’ is a critical essay published in 1917 by ________.

  1. Michael Holquist
  2. Viktor Shklovsky
  3. Tzvetan Todorov
  4. Roman Jakobson
Viktor Shklovsky’s ‘Art as Technique’ (1917) introduced ostranenie or defamiliarisation, arguing that art makes the familiar strange to restore perception.

2. Which Russian Formalist published the pioneering essay that Eagleton sees as marking the ‘beginnings of the transformation which has overtaken literary theory in this century’?

  1. Alexander Pushkin
  2. Viktor Shklovsky
  3. Leo Tolstoy
  4. Fyodor Dostoevsky
Eagleton dates the transformation of literary theory to 1917, when the young Russian Formalist Viktor Shklovsky published his pioneering essay ‘Art as Device’.

3. According to Viktor Shklovsky, which novel was ‘the most typical novel in world literature’ because it impedes its own story-line so that it hardly gets off the ground?

  1. Animal Farm
  2. History of the Rebellion
  3. Tristram Shandy
  4. Don Quixote
Shklovsky called Sterne’s Tristram Shandy ‘the most typical novel in world literature’ because its digressions so impede the story-line that it hardly gets started.

4. Viktor Shklovsky’s name is associated with

  1. Russian Formalism
  2. New Historicism
  3. Reader-Response Theory
  4. Postmodernism
Viktor Shklovsky, author of “Art as Technique” (1917) and founder of OPOYAZ, was a leading Russian Formalist.

5. Viktor Shklovsky was a member of:

  1. Moscow School
  2. New Critical School
  3. Prague School
  4. Russian Formalism
Viktor Shklovsky was a founder of OPOJAZ in St Petersburg and a leading Russian Formalist, known for “Art as Technique” and the concept of defamiliarisation.

6. Who is the author of ‘Art as Technique’?

  1. Viktor Shklovsky
  2. Mikhail Bakhtin
  3. Leo Tolstoy
  4. Theodor Adorno
Viktor Shklovsky’s “Art as Technique” (1917) argues that art defamiliarises (ostranenie) the habitual to restore fresh perception, making “the stone stony”.

Formalist Concepts

7. Formalism as a school of thought was officially suppressed by the Russian government because ________. Complete the sentence with the appropriate clause.

  1. the Russian Formalists bitterly critiqued the economic system of the government
  2. the Formalist school of thought idealised oligarchy as a mode of governance
  3. it focused exclusively on the literariness of language while underplaying social and political contexts
  4. none of the above
Soviet authorities condemned Formalism for treating literature as autonomous verbal device while neglecting its social and political content, and it was suppressed by around 1930.

8. Which person is NOT included in the ranks of the Russian Formalists?

  1. Viktor Shklovsky
  2. Roman Jakobson
  3. Heinrich Wölfflin
  4. Boris Tomashevsky
Heinrich Wölfflin was a Swiss art historian whose formal analysis influenced the movement, whereas Jakobson, Shklovsky and Tomashevsky were Russian Formalists.

9. When did the Russian Formalists emerge?

  1. Before WWII
  2. Before the Bolshevik Revolution
  3. After WWI
  4. During the Russian Revolution
The Russian Formalists emerged in the years before the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution, through the Moscow Linguistic Circle (1915) and OPOJAZ (1916).

10. Who silenced the Russian Formalists?

  1. Bolsheviks
  2. Socialists
  3. Liberals
  4. Stalinists
Eagleton notes that the Formalists flourished through the 1920s until they were effectively silenced by Stalinism around 1930.

11. According to Eagleton, the Russian Formalists rejected what kind of doctrines that had influenced literary criticism before them?

  1. Quasi-mystical Symbolist doctrines
  2. Quasi-mystical fictional doctrines
  3. Quasi-mystical religious doctrines
  4. Quasi-mystical psychoanalytic doctrines
Eagleton writes that the Formalists rejected the quasi-mystical Symbolist doctrines which had influenced criticism before them, turning to the literary text itself.

12. According to Eagleton, the Russian Formalists shifted their attention to the ‘material reality’ of what?

  1. The critic
  2. The text
  3. The facts
  4. The fiction
Eagleton says the Formalists, in a practical, scientific spirit, shifted attention to the material reality of the literary text itself.

13. Why did the Russian Formalists NOT see a literary work as a vehicle for ideas, a reflection of reality or an incarnation of transcendental truth?

  1. Because they saw language as potentially empowering the masses.
  2. Because they saw language as a mode of speech for the wealthy.
  3. Because they saw language as obtuse, vague and ephemeral.
  4. Because they saw language as words and not objects or feelings.
For the Formalists a literary work was a material organisation of language, made of words rather than objects or feelings, not a vehicle for ideas or truth.

14. Formalism is the application of what to the study of literature?

  1. Economics
  2. Sociology
  3. Linguistics
  4. Psychology
Eagleton calls Formalism essentially the application of linguistics to the study of literature, concerned with the structures of language rather than content.

15. The Formalists were not out to define literature, but they were out to define what?

  1. Literariness
  2. Criticism
  3. Inventiveness
  4. Realism
The Formalists sought to define not ‘literature’ but ‘literariness’, Jakobson’s term for the special uses of language that make a text literary.

16. In the formalistic school of criticism art is:

  1. entertainment
  2. style
  3. matter
  4. preaching
Formalists locate art in form, style and device rather than in content, moral message or entertainment; for Shklovsky art is technique.

17. ‘Formal criticism’ relates to the structure of:

  1. Content
  2. Myths
  3. Literary devices
  4. Form
Formal criticism studies a work as an arrangement of literary devices, following the Formalist view of literature as the sum of its devices.

18. Which of the following theoretical movements claimed that “the device is the only hero of literature”?

  1. Deconstruction
  2. New Criticism
  3. Phenomenology
  4. Russian Formalism
Roman Jakobson’s 1921 claim that if literary scholarship is to be a science it must treat the device as its only hero is a Russian Formalist slogan.

19. Which two terms among the following are associated with formalist criticism?

A. aura
B. actant
C. narratee
D. defamiliarisation
E. foregrounding
  1. A and C only
  2. B and D only
  3. B and C only
  4. D and E only
Defamiliarisation (Shklovsky) and foregrounding (Mukařovský) are Formalist and Prague School terms; aura is Benjamin’s, actant Greimas’s and narratee Prince’s.

20. There are four models of relating literature to history. Which of the following is associated with formalism?

  1. Literary texts are universal and transcend history: the historical context of their production and reception has no bearing on the literary work, which is aesthetically autonomous, having its own laws, being a world unto itself.
  2. The historical context of a literary work is integral to a proper understanding of it: the text is produced within a specific historical context but in its literariness it remains separate from that context.
  3. Literary works can help us to understand the time in which they are set: realist texts in particular provide imaginative representations of specific historical moments, events or periods.
  4. Literary texts are bound up with other discourses and rhetorical structures: they are part of a history that is still in the process of being written.
Formalism treats the literary work as autonomous and self-contained, governed by its own laws, so its historical context is irrelevant to its meaning and value.

21. Who among the following is not associated with Russian Formalism?

  1. Roman Jakobson
  2. Viktor Shklovsky
  3. Boris Eichenbaum
  4. Georges Poulet
Georges Poulet was a Belgian critic of the Geneva School of phenomenological criticism; Jakobson, Eichenbaum and Shklovsky were Russian Formalists.

22. The discussions of the OPOJAZ group and the Moscow Linguistic Circle contributed to:

  1. Modernism
  2. Formalism
  3. Marxism
  4. Postmodernism
Russian Formalism grew from two groups: OPOJAZ in St Petersburg (Shklovsky, Eikhenbaum) and the Moscow Linguistic Circle led by Roman Jakobson.

23. Key texts of Russian Formalism were translated into French in Théorie de la littérature (1965) by:

  1. Viktor Shklovsky
  2. Victor Erlich
  3. Tzvetan Todorov
  4. Yury Tynyanov
Tzvetan Todorov edited and translated the Formalists in Théorie de la littérature (1965), introducing Russian Formalism to French structuralism.

24. Who among the following has been credited by the Russian Formalists with laying the foundation of comparative literature?

  1. Alexander Veselovsky
  2. Viktor Shklovsky
  3. Vladimir Propp
  4. Roman Jakobson
Alexander Veselovsky’s historical poetics, a founding work of Russian comparative literature, was the main predecessor the Formalists engaged with.

Roman Jakobson

25. According to the Russian critic Roman Jakobson, literature represents ‘organized ________ committed on ordinary ________.’

  1. protest; speech
  2. violence; people
  3. religion; writing
  4. violence; speech
Roman Jakobson described literature as ‘organized violence committed on ordinary speech’, since literary language intensifies and estranges everyday language.

26. “According to ________, language functions poetically when we transport the words related along the metaphoric or analogous axis on to the contiguous or metonymic axis.” Which option should be selected to fill in the blank?

  1. Viktor Shklovsky
  2. Roman Ingarden
  3. Roman Jakobson
  4. Ferdinand de Saussure
In “Linguistics and Poetics” (1960) Roman Jakobson defined the poetic function as projecting the principle of equivalence from the axis of selection onto the axis of combination.

27. ‘Markedness’, a state of standing out as non-typical, was a formalist concept categorised by ____.

  1. Mikhail Bakhtin
  2. Roman Jakobson
  3. Boris Eichenbaum
  4. Vladimir Propp
Markedness was developed in the Prague Linguistic Circle by Roman Jakobson and Nikolai Trubetzkoy to describe the asymmetry between marked (non-typical) and unmarked (default) terms in an opposition.

Prague School

28. “The just man justices.” What kind of foregrounding do you find in the above line?

  1. Syntactic
  2. Semantic
  3. Collocation
  4. None of the above
In Hopkins’s line the noun justice is converted into a verb, a grammatical deviation that foregrounds the word through its unexpected syntactic function.

Want to understand Russian Formalism properly, not just practise it?

The Literary Theory & Criticism course has complete video lectures on every school, with PDF notes for every lecture in the app, and printed solved MCQ booklets delivered free to your home.

See the course →
See all 25 parts of Literary Theory MCQs
error: Content is protected !!